Certainly, those apps could be argued to "intefere with other apps" just as much as AdBlock Plus does. There is currently no HTTPS Everywhere port for Android because the OS lacks an adequate API for implementing it elegantly on non-rooted devices. Although it's worth noting that AdBlock Plus isn't hostile to all advertising-based business models and only blocks a fraction of Google's ads by default This is the kind of manipulative attack against openness that we've learned to expect from Apple, but we're extremely distressed to see it from Google.įor developers on the Android and other Google teams who are reading this, we urge you to rethink this terrible decision. Making it hard to install useful software will have the concrete effect of greatly reducing how many people actually succeed when they try to do so. Google may try to reply to this criticism by saying that on most (but not all) Android devices, there is still a way to tweak the system settings to allow installation of AdBlock Plus from outside of the Play Store. Or is Google going to follow the letter of its policy closely, in which case we would expect to see other useful privacy-enhancing technologies blocked from the Play Store, such as the apps that control the permissions of other apps (for instance, preventing the Skype app from tracking your location or the Foursquare app from grabbing the contents of your addressbook) or a hypothetical future port of HTTPS Everywhere? 2 Are they just going to target ad blockers? Ad blockers are not only useful and extremely popular, but also currently the only way that Internet users can effectively protect themselves against non-consensual third party tracking. It isn't clear yet how far Google is going to go in censoring the Play Store. Google's stated reason for the ban is that the Android app allegedly "interferes with or accesses another service or product in an unauthorized manner." This policy is broad, vague, and arbitrary. It is not only a betrayal of the principle of openness, but a betrayal of the trust that people put in Google when they decide to buy an Android phone. This new form of censorship is the exact opposite. Google established a reputation for building tools that put the interests of their users first. 1 But until recently, the company did an admirable job of leaving that matter aside and letting users make their own choices about whether they wanted to hide ads on their phones and in their browsers. Google clearly has a vested interest in preventing people from installing ad blocking software like AdBlock Plus. But with today's news, that commitment to openness suddenly looks much, much weaker. Until now, the Internet and software development communities have relied on Google to be safely on their side when it comes to building open platforms, encouraging innovation, and giving users maximum choice about how their computers will function. This is hugely disappointing because it demonstrates that Google is willing to censor software and abandon its support for open platforms as soon as there's an ad-related business reason for doing so. In a shocking move, Google has recently deleted AdBlock Plus from the Android Play Store.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |